Recently, because of the death of mr. suleimani, the newly detente situation in the middle east has been on the brink of war again, and for mr. suleimani's death, the u.s. did not seem to be ready to rely on the accounts, they are very smart to admit and responsible for the incident, the u.s. secretary of state pompeo has long been damned, such remarks have also surprised countries, but also angered the iranians, a war is imminent.
Just 24 hours after mr sulimani was killed, ishmael kani took the line and threatened to kill many people in the middle east. Although the u.s. has made some preparations for this, many netizens and military experts believe that iran can only beat the gun, and they have not shaken the strength of the u.s., but are the conclusions true?
If the battlefield is in iran, then iran is the defensive side, although the two river valleys are dominated by the plain, but iran is after all familiar with the land, if the u. s. army once into iran, iran's forces into pieces and u. s. guerrilla warfare, the situation is promising.
And the river basins are often dust-shaven, with american soldiers becoming less effective in such extreme weather conditions, and iranian soldiers who have lived here since childhood will be more adaptable, and even if the u. s.has advanced individual equipment, it won't fully offset the effects of extreme weather.
Unlike Iraq, Iran has not experienced the depletion of the war and, with Russian backing behind it, its weapons and equipment are not a complete threat to the US. For example, Iran's S300 anti-aircraft missiles and Soviet 30s, especially the S300 anti-aircraft missiles, cannot only shoot down U.S. drones, but even if American fighters come, it may be difficult to escape the intercept of such anti-aircraft missiles.
In addition to buying Russian-made equipment, Iran's military has also been actively purchasing the equipment of flower growers, whose skins are good and cheap.
It is with these more sophisticated weapons and equipment that Iran has the courage to challenge the United States, but its third advantage is unique compared to its weaponry.
Iran's situation is different from that of iraq, where the biggest benefit of washington's overthrow of saddam's government in 2003 was the presence of factions in iraq, in part in the presence of the iraqi opposition, and in iran.
Some time ago, the United States had tried to carry out a color revolution in Iran, but under the guidance of Iran's spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Iranian people were once again united, and this was the difference between Iran and Iraq, where religious leaders often had a strong centripetal force, and where even the black sheep could not lift the waves. What a country feared most was internal struggle, and there was clearly no internal struggle.
If u. s.military chooses to wage war when iran is united, even if it overthrows the current government, it takes up a crater that could burn to death at any time, so it would be unwise for the u. s. to attack iran at this time.
The three advantages are iran's biding of american capital, and the three obstacles are key to america's inability to do so easily, and then the situation can only go one step at a time.